I was watching "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" last night and toward the end they aired a segment that infuriated me. See, I typically enjoy that show, so when those otherwise intelligent people say things they are patently stupid I am disappointed. Here's what happened.
Apple is suing Samsung for patent infringement because of some presumed similarities involving the Ipod. Who cares, right? Well Samsung has responded that Apple has a lot of nerve considering it stole the concept for the Ipod from the film 2001: A Space Odyssey.
This led Olbermann to rather sanctimoniously inquire of his NASA guest: Which comes first, the science fiction or the technology?"
The answer he was seeking and the answer he received were the same: the technology.
To which I can only reply: Wrong!
Science books do not inspire us. They may intrigue or inform or even confuse us, but they have never caused anyone to jump up and down and scream eureka in the way that the best imaginative fiction has. Oh, sure, Carl Sagan and Isaac Asimov and Stephen Hawking have all written science books that have changed people's lives. No question. But those books themselves could not have existed with the wild dreamers who preceded them: Fritz Leiber, Ben Bova, Larry Niven, Robert Heinlein, Kate Wilhelm, Philip K. Dick, Arthur C. Clarke, Ray Bradbury, Joanna Russ, Ursula Le Guin, Harlan Ellsion--the list is endless, stretching much farther than the imagination of Mr. Olbermann, I am sorry to say.
Without the books and stories that asked what kinds of world were out there and how might we discover them, there would never have been a Hawking to write about the universe, much less a John Glenn or Alan Shepherd or Neil Armstrong, or Sally Ride, for that matter, to go forth and attempt to answer those questions. Sure, I'll admit that there is some cross over. Today's discoveries certainly feed tomorrow's questions. But the questions--the dreams--come before any of it.
This does not mean that I think Samsung's argument that Apple stole the idea from Clarke and Kubrick holds water, although it just might. What it does mean is that the writer is always being demeaned in popular culture as someone influenced by the world around him or her, rather than as the instigator of the impetus for the immediate present and near future. The men and women listed above did not invent the modern space program. But they list the fuse for the first Mercury rockets, they sparked the imagination of millions of kids who grew up wanting to be either astronauts, cosmonauts, or scientists who would facilitate their adventures.
Just as Edgar Rice Burroughs inspired a generation of young readers to yearn for terrestrial exploration of jungles, just as Jules Verne led many a mind to ponder the mysteries of the sea, so did these writers and others I could have named created the initial yearning for knowledge that a science lab or high tech lecture could never have induced.
Apple is suing Samsung for patent infringement because of some presumed similarities involving the Ipod. Who cares, right? Well Samsung has responded that Apple has a lot of nerve considering it stole the concept for the Ipod from the film 2001: A Space Odyssey.
This led Olbermann to rather sanctimoniously inquire of his NASA guest: Which comes first, the science fiction or the technology?"
The answer he was seeking and the answer he received were the same: the technology.
To which I can only reply: Wrong!
Science books do not inspire us. They may intrigue or inform or even confuse us, but they have never caused anyone to jump up and down and scream eureka in the way that the best imaginative fiction has. Oh, sure, Carl Sagan and Isaac Asimov and Stephen Hawking have all written science books that have changed people's lives. No question. But those books themselves could not have existed with the wild dreamers who preceded them: Fritz Leiber, Ben Bova, Larry Niven, Robert Heinlein, Kate Wilhelm, Philip K. Dick, Arthur C. Clarke, Ray Bradbury, Joanna Russ, Ursula Le Guin, Harlan Ellsion--the list is endless, stretching much farther than the imagination of Mr. Olbermann, I am sorry to say.
Without the books and stories that asked what kinds of world were out there and how might we discover them, there would never have been a Hawking to write about the universe, much less a John Glenn or Alan Shepherd or Neil Armstrong, or Sally Ride, for that matter, to go forth and attempt to answer those questions. Sure, I'll admit that there is some cross over. Today's discoveries certainly feed tomorrow's questions. But the questions--the dreams--come before any of it.
This does not mean that I think Samsung's argument that Apple stole the idea from Clarke and Kubrick holds water, although it just might. What it does mean is that the writer is always being demeaned in popular culture as someone influenced by the world around him or her, rather than as the instigator of the impetus for the immediate present and near future. The men and women listed above did not invent the modern space program. But they list the fuse for the first Mercury rockets, they sparked the imagination of millions of kids who grew up wanting to be either astronauts, cosmonauts, or scientists who would facilitate their adventures.
Just as Edgar Rice Burroughs inspired a generation of young readers to yearn for terrestrial exploration of jungles, just as Jules Verne led many a mind to ponder the mysteries of the sea, so did these writers and others I could have named created the initial yearning for knowledge that a science lab or high tech lecture could never have induced.






